You have already had
this argument. Have it here.

Somebody in your organisation disagrees with you about the schema, the survey interval or the platform. Six rooms of practitioners are about to have the same disagreement, out loud, with the people who have run it both ways.
What we are looking for
Someone who has run the thing, not advised on it. If you can describe what broke on your last programme in one sentence, and what you did next in two, you are the person this room wants to hear.
The best sessions we produce come from people who arrived slightly reluctant, with a story they were not sure they were allowed to tell. Delivery polish is our job. The scar is yours.
You do not need a title, a talk track or a deck. You need one honest position you are prepared to defend in front of peers.
Nobody buys the question.
Partnership can include a programme position, and where it does we publish it rather than implying it. What no partnership buys is the question a session takes on. The agenda sets that, the moderator runs the room, and every session ends in open floor. The argument you bring is the reason you are there.
What the format asks
What you get
Where we are looking right now
Open across the agenda, and particularly these three.
If your argument does not fit any of them, say so anyway.
Start the conversation
Yourself, or somebody better. Nominating a colleague or a peer at another organisation is welcome. We approach them ourselves, and we will not say who suggested them unless you want us to.
